Susan Rice – She Volunteered to Give False Information, Why is it Racist to Question her Decision to do so?
Latest posts by Wayne Dupree (see all)
- New Captain America movie will force you to choose a side! Check out the new trailer – AWESOME! - November 25, 2015
- Ted Cruz responds to Rubio’s Super PAC painting him soft on National Security - November 25, 2015
- Dashcam video of Laquan McDonald shooting; this is bad! - November 25, 2015
Susan Rice perpetuated the Obama lie and helped him with the attempted cover-up of why 4 Americans were left to die when they could have been saved, and now she wants a promotion? When the liberals have no other valid argument they always fall back on racism and sexism. They created political correctness to be used as a weapon when needed and the only ones they are fooling with this tactic is themselves.
Susan Rice is NO victim. The only victims here remain four dead Americans on 11 Sep 12. Two months later America still does not know the circumstances surrounding Obama’s involvement. That’s the real question here. Furthermore, liberals are trying to turn this investigation into sexism and racism because of her gender and color of skin? Rice got her talking points from the WH and Obama knew it was a terrorist attack from the start. I suspect he ordered the stand down too. Getting to the Benghazi truth should transcend party lines but apparently the ruling elites are protecting Obama’s dumb ASS. Petraeus’ two contradicting testimonies and resignation also point back to the WH. This scandal is about deception and lies not racism. Truth be damned.
Outside of being an extreme radical, she lied on five Sunday shows about Benghazi. If she had no pertinent knowledge of the event she should have been a good government worker or declined to do the shows. She was sent out for Obama to help tell those lies, in order for Obama to do whatever it took to get back in Office. She is causality, damaged goods and hopefully she will not be replacing Hillary.
Let us not forget when Rice stuck her middle finger at Richard Hollbrooke during a meeting with staff at the State Dept; how she condemned Hillary’s Iraq and Iran position; how she mocked McCain’s 2008 trip to Iraq; how she unnerved European allies when she denounced as counterproductive the U.N. policy that Iran suspend its nuclear program before talks begin. European diplomats were rattled by her remarks because the precondition was their idea and quarreling with Russia over Syria causing them to say her appointment would make it more difficult to work with the U.s. I think we can do better.
In my opinion, her race has nothing to do with it. She misled the public. She claims she didn’t know it was a terrorist attack, and Obama took the blame; however, 96 percent of the public believed it was a terror attack right off. Why wasn’t she capable of figuring that out? Many wonder if she’s even competent enough to be secretary of state?